🏛️Official — FIA
Loading OpenSourceSports…
Front wing flap adjustment is driven by up to two actuators and must complete the switch between Corner Mode and Straight Mode within 400 ms; on failure the system must return to Corner Mode (Article C3.10.10); The rear wing flap is driven by a single actuator, with the same 400 ms transition lim...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that having driver-operable wing-flap actuators means they can be physically manipulated by the driver mid-race for on-the-fly adjustments, but in reality, these devices are pre-programmed to optimize aerodynamics based on the car's speed and position, so drivers cannot alter their settings during a race.
The Survival Cell and its impact structures must pass the frontal impact, roll structure, survival cell load, side impact, front impact and rear impact tests (Articles C13.2 to C13.7); All materials used must be commercially available (Article C15.1.3)
Why people argue about this
People often assume that composite chassis in F1 cars are just made of carbon fiber, which they believe is inherently strong and doesn't need crash tests. But actually, these materials can be tricky to predict their strength under impact, leading to debates about how thorough the crash testing must be for safety compliance.
Only the engine and the ERS-K may propel the car and/or Recharge energy (Article C5.2.1), and the energy of the Turbo Charger's rotating parts may not be transferred to any other component (Article C5.3.1), so there is no MGU-H; Fuel energy flow must not exceed 3000 MJ/h, with no cylinder exceedi...
— Section C
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the tripled MGU-K output means a significant increase in top speed for F1 cars, which they mistakenly believe will lead to more overtaking opportunities. However, the actual impact of this rule is on managing energy recovery systems rather than raw performance, so it won't necessarily translate into faster lap times or easier passes.
Chassis: single-seat car built around a Survival Cell, with a Secondary Roll Structure (Halo) made to FIA standard 8869-2018 and supplied by an FIA designated manufacturer (Article C12.4.2); Minimum mass: 724 kg plus the Nominal Tyre Mass, or 726 kg plus the Nominal Tyre Mass during Sprint Qualif...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that reducing chassis weight from 798 kg to 768 kg in F1 for 2026 will solely increase car speed, but actually, it's about optimizing aerodynamics and fuel efficiency within new sustainability mandates, leading to a more balanced approach to performance.
Circuit standards, the calendar and pit lane speed limits are not set by Section C, which regulates the car; they are covered by circuit homologation and the Sporting Regulations; No refuelling during a race: fuel may not be added to nor removed from a car during a Race (Article C6.4.4); A cover ...
— Section C
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the pit lane speed limit of 80 km/h applies universally across all circuits, forgetting that it's only enforced at Grade 1 circuits where Section 3 requires homologation for the playing area. They overlook the distinction between Grade 1 and other circuit types, leading to misunderstandings about which rules apply where.
Each Competitor must satisfy the FIA and the stewards that its car complies with these regulations at all times during a Competition; for power units the duty extends to the PU Manufacturer (Article C1.5); The FIA technical delegate establishes the driver's reference mass (Article C4.5.1) and sel...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that having a maximum of two drivers means teams can only use one car for races, which is incorrect. The real meaning here is that each team must have at least one driver in their grid, and they're allowed to designate up to two as the ones who start the race. Confusion arises because it's easy to misinterpret this as a limit on the number of cars per team rather than drivers.
Only the engine and the ERS-K may propel the car and/or Recharge energy (Article C5.2.1), and the energy of the Turbo Charger's rotating parts may not be transferred to any other component (Article C5.3.1), so there is no MGU-H; Fuel energy flow must not exceed 3000 MJ/h, with no cylinder exceedi...
— Section C
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the new energy deployment limits in 2026 will solely dictate how much power a car can generate from its engine, but actually, they're more about setting specific boundaries on where and when energy recovery systems like MGUs can be used to maximize efficiency without compromising safety or fairness.
Section C awards no points; championship scoring is set out in the Sporting Regulations. Technically, compliance is binary: a car must comply with these regulations in their entirety at all times during a Competition (Article C1.3).
— Section C
Why people argue about this
People often assume that technical compliance is directly tied to race scoring in Formula 1, thinking that non-compliant cars are automatically disqualified from all results. However, the Technical Regulations only dictate which vehicles can participate in a session based on scrutineering outcomes; they don't affect how points are awarded or calculated once a car has passed inspection.
Underweight: at all times during the Competition, Car Mass must not be less than the Minimum Mass (Article C4.1); Unapproved fuel: no fuel may be used in a Competition or for Pre-Season Public Collective Testing without the prior written approval of the FIA (Article C16.4.2); Dangerous constructi...
— Section C
Why people argue about this
People often assume that a car failing scrutineering means it's automatically banned from the race outright, forgetting that its results might only be disqualified for that session if found non-compliant after inspection. They overlook the fact that cars can still compete in future sessions or races as long as they meet all technical regulations thereafter.
The Halo (Secondary Roll Structure) must be made to FIA standard 8869-2018 (Article C12.4.2), and its attachments are load-tested, the centreline test applying 130.1 kN vertically downward and 51.6 kN rearward (Article C13.3.2).
— Section C
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the mandatory halo cockpit protection is solely for driver safety, forgetting that it's also designed to prevent debris from hitting them during high-speed crashes, thus reducing the risk of serious head injuries. They overlook the fact that this rule mandates a specific design and testing protocol to ensure its effectiveness in real-world scenarios.