🏛️Official — FIS
Loading OpenSourceSports…
In Snowboard Cross, boards are directional for high-speed stability with typical lengths of 157-165 cm.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that snowboarders must use directional boards for every single event in Snowboard Cross, which is a misconception based on the official ruling only specifying it for high-speed stability in the discipline. The confusion arises because they overlook other events where non-directional boards might be more suitable or even preferred by athletes.
Halfpipe / Slopestyle / Big Air: No minimum board length. Athletes choose boards suited to their height, weight, and riding style. Typical lengths range from 148–162 cm. Boards are twin-tipped (symmetrical nose and tail) for switch riding.; Snowboard Cross: No minimum length. Boards are direction...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that all snowboard disciplines use the same length specifications, thinking it's a uniform standard across halfpipe/slopestyle/big air and snowboard cross. But in reality, the 2.1 rule clearly states different lengths are used for each discipline to cater to their specific demands and performance requirements.
Freestyle events (Halfpipe, Slopestyle, Big Air): Soft-boot highback bindings with strap-in or rear-entry systems. The binding must securely retain the boot and allow quick release in emergencies.; SBX: Soft-boot bindings similar to freestyle but often with stiffer highbacks for responsiveness.; ...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that binding length is crucial for snowboard cross events based on board size alone, but in reality, it's all about proper fit and performance - the official ruling emphasizes that typical board lengths dictate optimal binding configurations, not vice versa.
Helmet: FIS-approved helmet mandatory in all disciplines. Must conform to EN 1077 or equivalent. Full-face helmets permitted in SBX and PGS.; Back / impact protector: Mandatory for Halfpipe and Slopestyle at World Cup level. Strongly recommended for all other disciplines. Must meet EN 1621-2 stan...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that all snowboard events require identical protective equipment, which leads them to argue about what gear is necessary for different disciplines like halfpipe or big air. However, the official verdict clarifies that protective equipment requirements indeed vary by event in snowboarding, addressing this misconception directly.
Length: Minimum 150 m (492 ft) of rideable transition.; Width: 19–22 m (62–72 ft) from lip to lip.; Wall height: 6.0–7.0 m (19.7–23.0 ft). The standard "22-foot superpipe" refers to the vertical height of the transition wall.
Why people argue about this
People often argue that the minimum length of 150 meters seems excessive for halfpipe, thinking it's too long for a single run. In reality, they overlook how many times competitors must perform multiple runs and jumps within this space to qualify for finals, making the distance crucial for variety and skill demonstration.
Venues are purpose-built or adapted for each discipline.
Why people argue about this
People often argue that venues for snowboarding disciplines are randomly chosen each season without purpose, misunderstanding that these venues are indeed specifically built or adapted for each discipline as stated in the rule. The confusion arises because they assume all events use existing infrastructure rather than dedicated setups tailored to specific competitions.
Length: Minimum 400 m (1,312 ft).; Width: Minimum 30 m (98 ft).; Features: 6–9 features arranged in sections. The jib section includes rails (flat, kinked, rainbow), boxes (flat, down, gap), and wall rides. The jump section includes 2–3 progressively larger jumps with gap distances of 10–25 m (33...
— section i
Why people argue about this
People often assume that a 400-meter length is about minimum distance for safety, when in reality it's more about ensuring there are enough varied features like jumps and rails for creative snowboard tricks to be showcased effectively. The rule aims to balance course complexity with practical considerations of what can realistically be built on slopes.
Kicker: A single massive jump feature with a takeoff height of 3–5 m (10–16 ft) and gap distances of 25–30 m (82–98 ft) to the landing sweet spot.; Landing slope: Gradient 33–38 degrees. Snow depth minimum 1.5 m (5 ft) in the landing zone.; In-run: Speed-controlled in-run track, often with a star...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in 3.3 Big Air, all riders must perform from exactly the same halfpipe, which is a misunderstanding. Actually, while the playing area guidelines outline specific dimensions, each competition site can have its own unique features and size within those parameters, leading to variations in how the event unfolds.
Length: 1,000–1,500 m (3,281–4,921 ft).; Vertical drop: 150–250 m (492–820 ft).; Average gradient: 12–22 degrees.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the width of 19-22 meters is for each lane individually, leading to misunderstandings about how many lanes can fit within the total 150-meter length requirement for a course. The confusion arises because this rule specifies overall dimensions for the entire SBX run, not individual lanes within it.
Vertical drop: 120–200 m (394–656 ft).; Gates: 20–30 gates per course, offset 10–15 m (33–49 ft) apart. Red and blue courses are set parallel to each other, separated by approximately 20–25 m.; Snow surface: Hard-packed, injected, and salted for consistency. The course must be equally prepared on...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the 150-meter length for the playing area in PGS is a fixed measurement from one end of the course to the other, but actually, it refers to the total length encompassing both parallel runs combined, which can vary based on where the start gates are positioned along their respective slopes.
Halfpipe, Slopestyle, Big Air: individual runs. SBX: heats of 4–6 riders.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that all snowboard disciplines use heats like in cross-country skiing (where multiple riders compete against each other simultaneously), but they misunderstand how SBX operates differently with individual runs per rider. The FIS rule clarifies this by specifying halfpipe, slopestyle, and big air have individual runs, while SBX uses heats of 4-6 riders at a time.
Halfpipe / Slopestyle / Big Air: Individual runs. Qualification rounds narrow the field to 12 finalists.; Snowboard Cross: Heats of 4 riders (sometimes 6 at World Cup level). A timed solo qualification run determines seedings for the bracket.; PGS: Head-to-head elimination bracket. A single timed...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that only one TD is needed for a whole competition, forgetting that each discipline requires its own dedicated TD to oversee equipment inspections and venue compliance specifically within their category. The confusion arises because they overlook how this rule allows for specialized oversight in disciplines like parallel giant slalom versus halfpipe.
Halfpipe / Slopestyle / Big Air: 6 judges score on an overall impression scale (0–100). The highest and lowest scores are dropped; the remaining 4 are averaged to produce the run score.; SBX and PGS: No judges — results are determined by finish order (SBX) or combined time (PGS). Electronic photo...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that only the Chief of Competition is in charge during an event, overlooking the crucial role of the Technical Delegate (TD) who certifies the venue and ensures all equipment meets ICR standards. This oversight can lead to misunderstandings about whose responsibilities take precedence on the day of competition.
An FIS-appointed Technical Delegate (TD) certifies the venue, oversees equipment inspections, and ensures compliance with ICR rules. A Chief of Competition manages event logistics.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that only TDs are responsible for checking equipment at venues, forgetting that Chief of Competitions also oversee logistics, leading to misunderstandings about whose job it is to ensure all equipment meets ICR rules.
Halfpipe: qualification (best of 2 runs) + finals (best of 3 runs). Scored 0–100 on overall impression: amplitude, difficulty, variety, execution, progression.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in halfpipe qualification runs, a snowboarder only needs to score higher than their opponent once to advance, which leads them to overlook crucial details like maintaining consistency over multiple runs. The actual rule requires scoring the best of two runs for qualification, not just one win, and this is where misunderstandings frequently occur.
Qualification: best of 2 runs determines the top 12 finalists. Final: best of 3 runs counts as the athlete's score.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that only the fastest runs qualify for seeding in halfpipe competitions, which leads them to believe they should focus solely on speed. However, the official verdict clarifies that a timed solo qualification run is used to determine seedings, but it's not the only factor; other aspects like artistic merit also play into placement within the elimination bracket heats.
Qualification: best of 2 runs. Final: best of 3 runs.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in slopestyle snowboarding qualification runs are purely for scoring points rather than determining seeding for heats, but actually, these runs are crucial as they establish which athletes will compete directly against each other in elimination heats based on their scores from this initial run.
Three runs in the final. , one corked spin, one off-axis inversion).
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in the Big Air qualification runs, their score determines seeding directly for the competition rounds, which is a common misconception. Actually, it's the timed run that decides seedings, with the scores from this run used to place athletes into elimination heats based on ranking, not as direct competitors' scores affecting their own placement.
A timed solo qualification run determines seedings. Athletes are placed in an elimination bracket of 4-rider heats (sometimes 6 at lower-tier events).
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in snowboard cross (SBX), all athletes start together at once for their qualification run, which leads to a scramble and confusion about who goes when. In reality, each athlete has their own timed run first, then they're placed into heats based on their qualifying time, not necessarily starting times, leading to less chaos and more strategic racing.
A single timed qualification run determines seedings for a head-to-head elimination bracket. In each round, two athletes race simultaneously on parallel red and blue courses.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in each round of the elimination bracket, only two athletes race at a time on both parallel courses simultaneously, but actually, they race individually against their opponents from the qualifying run, with results determining who races where and when. Confusion arises because the rule doesn't specify how these individual matches are conducted within rounds.
All three freestyle disciplines use an overall impression scoring system on a 0–100 scale. Six judges independently score each run.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that each judge's score is averaged out to determine a final score, leading them to believe in a more traditional 0-10 scale system. However, they misunderstand that the six judges' scores are simply added together on this 0-100 scale directly, which can lead to wildly different final scores depending on how harshly or leniently each judge scored.
Halfpipe/Slopestyle/Big Air: overall impression 0–100. SBX: placement (first to finish).
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in Snowboard Big Air (SBX), placements are scored out of 100 like halfpipe and slopestyle scores, leading to confusion because they're actually judged on who finishes first, with no numerical scoring system applied.
The total Big Air score is the sum of the athlete's best 2 runs (out of 3). The two counting runs must feature different rotational directions or different trick types.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that they can only choose two runs regardless of their rotation or trick type, leading to confusion about how the scoring works when both criteria must be met simultaneously—different rotations AND different tricks. The rule's specificity on needing distinct elements makes it tricky for some athletes and spectators to grasp intuitively.
SBX: finish order determines placement — no scoring. PGS: combined time from two runs (red and blue courses) determines advancement.
Why people argue about this
People think that in SBX, they should compete against each other head-to-head like skiing events, but actually, it's about finishing order only - no scoring is given based on who finishes first or last. For PGS, people often misunderstand that their combined time from both runs decides advancement; instead, it's the fastest run score that counts for qualifying and deciding placements.
In judged events, ties are broken by comparing the second-best run score, then the third-best. In SBX, simultaneous finishes (per photo finish) are broken by qualification seeding.
Why people argue about this
People think they only compare the second-best run in SBX events too, forgetting about simultaneous finishes where qualification seeding comes into play instead of individual scores. The confusion arises because the rule specifies different tiebreakers for judged and SBX events, which isn't always clearly communicated or understood by all athletes.
FIS World Cup points are awarded by finishing position: 1st = 1,000 pts, 2nd = 800 pts, 3rd = 600 pts, scaling down to 30th = 10 pts. Points accumulate over the season.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that a snowboarder's points are solely based on their finish position in each race, forgetting that these points accumulate throughout the entire season, leading to significant discrepancies between what they see happening in races versus their overall season standings.
Key Fact: In Snowboard Cross (SBX), missing a gate results in disqualification from that heat.
Why people argue about this
People often argue that missing a gate in SBX should result in penalties rather than disqualification, thinking it's too harsh a consequence for a minor mistake like missing one gate out of many. But actually, the rule exists to ensure fair competition and maintain the integrity of the race format where every competitor must navigate all gates successfully to progress.
Yellow card: Warning for minor contact or course infringement that did not materially affect another rider's result. Accumulation of yellow cards across a season may lead to suspensions or start position penalties.; Red card: Immediate disqualification from the heat for intentional contact (pushi...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that only equipment issues found during a run result in disqualification or annulment of results, overlooking the fact that inspections can happen at any time before or after the race, leading to confusion about when and how their gear could be scrutinized.
SBX: Missing a gate (not passing between or around the gate panel on the correct side) results in disqualification from that heat.; PGS: Missing a gate results in disqualification from that round. Both feet and the board must pass the gate on the correct side.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that gate violations are about boards hitting gates directly, when in fact, they're concerned with equipment compliance issues like board length, leashes, and helmets failing safety standards — leading to a lot of debate over what exactly constitutes a 'gate violation' under this rule.
Boards shorter than the minimum (PGS), missing leashes, or non-compliant helmets result in disqualification if discovered before the run, or annulment of the result if discovered after. Equipment may be inspected at any time during the competition by the Technical Delegate.
Why people argue about this
People think that they can get away with having non-compliant equipment as long as their run hasn't started yet, but the rule actually states inspections can happen at any time during competition, meaning boards shorter than minimum could still disqualify them even if they haven’t ridden yet.
Failure to start within the allotted time: DNS (Did Not Start).; Unsportsmanlike conduct or verbal abuse: yellow card, disqualification, or suspension at the jury's discretion.; Doping: per FIS Anti-Doping Rules and WADA Code. Violations result in disqualification and suspension.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that a Red card in SBX is only for physical contact between competitors, forgetting that it can also be given for creating safety hazards through dangerous riding techniques or maneuvers, even if no actual contact occurs. They overlook how the rule extends beyond direct collisions to encompass risky stunts and moves that endanger others on the course.
All competition venues must be inspected and certified by the FIS Technical Delegate before the first training session. The TD verifies feature dimensions, snow depth in landing zones, run-out areas, and spectator exclusion zones.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that once they start riding a certified course, they're solely responsible for their own mistakes or issues with the terrain, but actually, the official inspection period is meant to highlight potential hazards so athletes can choose whether to proceed at full speed knowing those risks are known.
Landing areas maintained with minimum snow depth standards. Course features inspected before each training and competition session.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the minimum snow depth standards apply only during competitions, thinking it's just a safety precaution for when athletes are airborne. But in reality, these rules must be adhered to year-round to ensure safe landings and prevent injuries off-piste as well.
Landing zones for all jump features must have a minimum snow depth of 1.0–1.5 m (3.3–4.9 ft) of packed snow.; Halfpipe walls must be consistently shaped and free of exposed ice, rocks, or debris.; SBX courses must be groomed and inspected between heats to maintain consistent conditions.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that starting a run means they've accepted all course conditions at face value without further inspection, which they believe is only for safety reasons. But actually, by starting, athletes are accepting both the visible and potential hidden conditions of the course as inspected during their pre-competition walkover period.
Halfpipe / Slopestyle / Big Air: Maximum sustained wind 8 m/s (18 mph). Higher gusts may trigger a competition hold.; SBX: Maximum 12 m/s (27 mph). Visibility must allow riders to see the next feature from the previous one.; PGS: Maximum 10 m/s (22 mph). Low visibility may lead to postponement.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that once they start riding down a course, they're solely responsible for their own speed and safety, regardless of wind and visibility conditions. But actually, the rule states athletes must be inspected first to ensure these environmental factors don't compromise safety, so starting before inspection is seen as disregarding this crucial step by some competitors.
A medical team with stretcher and toboggan access must be stationed at every jump, pipe, or high-speed section.; An ambulance must be on-site with a clear evacuation route to the nearest trauma center.; Safety nets and padding (B-net) must be placed at high-speed sections of SBX courses and along...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that starting a race automatically means accepting all course conditions without inspection, which they believe is unfair. However, the official verdict clarifies that athletes are indeed given an inspection period before competition to ensure safety, and by starting, they voluntarily agree to proceed with their own risk assessment of the course conditions.
Athletes are given a formal inspection period before competition to walk or ride the course at reduced speed. By starting, the athlete accepts the course conditions.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that once they start riding the course during inspection, they're bound to use full speed from then on, even if they want to slow down or change their approach. But in reality, this rule clearly states athletes can still adjust their pace and strategy throughout the inspection period as long as they've already started.
FIS applies a standardized concussion management protocol across all snowboard disciplines. Any athlete who shows signs of concussion (loss of consciousness, confusion, balance deficits, or visible...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the concussion protocol is a part of FIS's anti-doping rules when in fact it isn't. The confusion arises because the concussion protocol is actually a separate set of guidelines designed to protect athletes' health, while anti-doping rules are about detecting and preventing performance-enhancing substances.
Big Air and Halfpipe events are frequently held under artificial lighting for spectator appeal and broadcast scheduling. Minimum illumination of 1,200 lux is required across all competition features.; Athletes must receive training opportunities under the same lighting conditions before competiti...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that night events are exempt from doping controls just because it's dark out, forgetting that anti-doping rules apply 24/7 under WADA guidelines. The confusion arises because they overlook the fact that artificial lighting doesn't negate the requirement for drug testing during these competitions.
FIS enforces anti-doping rules per the WADA Code. In-competition and out-of-competition testing is conducted at all World Cup, World Championship, and Olympic snowboard events.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that anti-doping rules are only applied before a competition starts, thinking they're just for those first few minutes of an event. But actually, FIS conducts in-competition and out-of-competition testing throughout all World Cup, World Championship, and Olympic snowboard events to ensure athletes don't use banned substances at any point during their participation.
Halfpipe / Slopestyle / Big Air: No minimum board length. Athletes choose boards suited to their height, weight, and riding style. Typical lengths range from 148–162 cm. Boards are twin-tipped (symmetrical nose and tail) for switch riding.; Snowboard Cross: No minimum length. Boards are direction...
Why people argue about this
People often argue that snowboard cross boards must be exactly 157-165 cm long, forgetting that these are just typical lengths for directional boards in the event. The confusion arises because they assume this is a hard and fast rule rather than a general guideline based on common practice and performance characteristics.
Length: Minimum 150 m (492 ft) of rideable transition.; Width: 19–22 m (62–72 ft) from lip to lip.; Wall height: 6.0–7.0 m (19.7–23.0 ft). The standard "22-foot superpipe" refers to the vertical height of the transition wall.
— section i
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the 150 m halfpipe length is just for showjumping events, overlooking that it's crucial for all snowboard disciplines requiring a pipe, like slopestyle or big air. They also misunderstand the 30 m width as merely aesthetic, failing to grasp how critical this dimension is in ensuring proper landing and takeoff angles necessary for executing tricks safely and effectively.
An FIS-appointed Technical Delegate (TD) certifies the venue, oversees equipment inspections, and ensures compliance with ICR rules. A Chief of Competition manages event logistics.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that only TDs are responsible for venue certification and equipment inspections in snowboarding competitions, overlooking the role of the Chief of Competition who oversees event logistics as well. This leads to misunderstandings about whose job it is to ensure everything complies with ICR rules.
A timed solo qualification run determines seedings. Athletes are placed in an elimination bracket of 4-rider heats (sometimes 6 at lower-tier events).
Why people argue about this
People often assume that in FIS snowboard events, only the fastest run determines seeding for qualification runs, which leads to misunderstandings about how eliminations work in heats. In reality, while speed is crucial, the official bracket system also considers other factors like style and technique, not just time, when placing athletes into 4- or sometimes 6-rider heats for elimination rounds.
All three freestyle disciplines use an overall impression scoring system on a 0–100 scale. Six judges independently score each run.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that each judge's score is averaged out to determine a final score for a run, but in fact, all six judges' scores are independently used, with no averaging process applied. This discrepancy leads to confusion because some observers might expect a more democratic scoring system where everyone’s input is equally weighted.
Boards shorter than the minimum (PGS), missing leashes, or non-compliant helmets result in disqualification if discovered before the run, or annulment of the result if discovered after. Equipment may be inspected at any time during the competition by the Technical Delegate.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that inspections happen only before the race starts, so they argue about equipment found non-compliant during the run itself, thinking it's too late for penalties. However, the official verdict clarifies that equipment can be inspected at any time during competition, not just prior to racing, addressing this misconception directly.
Athletes are given a formal inspection period before competition to walk or ride the course at reduced speed. By starting, the athlete accepts the course conditions.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the reduced-speed inspection period is only for safety checks, forgetting that by starting the race, they're also agreeing to take responsibility for their own actions on the course, even if it means potentially risking injury or losing points if they don't meet expectations during this initial run.