Pro League Network

Why people argue about this

People often assume that since CarJitsu is a combat sport, matches should be longer than 3 rounds of just over a minute each. They think it’s about exhausting opponents quickly, but actually, the shorter match length and frequent breaks are designed to keep the action exciting and fair by preventing fighters from getting overly fatigued too quickly, which could lead to unsafe or unfair conditions.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that heel hooks are only legal in CarJitsu at the beginner level, mistakenly believing they're banned for all competitors, which causes confusion when they learn senior-level fighters can use them.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that the seat changes are random and decided by a coin toss, which leads them to misunderstand that they're predetermined based on rounds - one competitor in each seat per round, with specific transitions from front to back. This rule can be tricky because it doesn't seem fair at first glance, leading to debates about how predictable or unpredictable these changes actually are.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that since CarJitsu involves crashing cars in a controlled environment, athletes are allowed to intentionally damage vehicles for dramatic effect. But actually, the waiver is meant to cover minor wear-and-tear and non-targeted contact with vehicle structures, preventing reckless behavior that could compromise safety or property.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that since cars are stationary during matches in CarJitsu, they can be driven around freely within a designated area before entering the playing zone. But actually, the official rule states the vehicles must remain stationary with engines off and brakes engaged throughout the match to ensure safety and fairness for all competitors.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that only one official is visible in the car during a match, thinking it's just the in-vehicle referee. But they misunderstand Section 4 which clearly states there are four officials total, including this in-car presence. They overlook the fact that these four cover all aspects of the game, not just the driver’s perspective.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that heel hooks are only allowed at Senior level in CarJitsu, forgetting that they're part of standard BJJ submissions included for scoring purposes from the start, regardless of belt color. This oversight leads to arguments about when and where heel hooks can be used legally during matches.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that aggression and dominance are more crucial for scoring in CarJitsu than submission decisions, which leads to arguments when judges disagree on what constitutes a dominant or aggressive move versus a clean submission. The confusion arises because both elements are meant to be evaluated, but the rule clarifies that submissions take precedence over other forms of victory.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that eye-pokes and throat strikes are just part of the rough-and-tumble nature of CarJitsu, so they argue that these penalties should be more lenient or even overlooked. Actually, what Yawar sees as crucial is maintaining a level of respect for the participants' bodies, hence why Section 7 makes clear-cut eye-pokes and throat strikes are instant game-killers with a DQ.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that since CarJitsu is a confined space, referees can't possibly inspect for hazards like sharp edges, but actually, they're limited by practical access issues and safety protocols ensure these areas are thoroughly checked despite the tight quarters.

Why people argue about this

People often assume that a win in CarJitsu is decided by who gets knocked out first, forgetting that submissions are also an option within 3 rounds. This leads to debates about whether knockouts should be considered as valid wins or if they're just bonus points for aggression.