Loading OpenSourceSports…
Beach Sambo (FIAS)
Verdict
Standard Sport Sambo foul taxonomy (passivity, illegal techniques, fleeing, etc.); Sand-specific: eye-poke with sand → DQ if intentional; Equipment violation: warning + correction
Why people argue about this
People often think that just using sand as a weapon in an eye-poke is okay if it's unintentional, but they're actually misunderstanding that even intentional use of sand for such an attack results in disqualification under this rule. The confusion arises because beach sambo rules are quite specific about the nature and intent behind fouls like this one.
Send this to your friend — argument over.
Think this rule could be improved?
No proposals submitted yet for this section.
